ISSN (Online): 3048-5568
info@spjmhs.com
Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging Logo

Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging

Official Journal of AARAIS

Open Access Journal

Original Research

Enhancing CT and MRI Positioning Competency Through Virtual Simulation: A Prospective Educational Study

Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging | Volume 3, Issue 2 | June 2026
Authors:
Subodh Kumar Singh
Nirwan University, India
Akash Mondal Co-Author
Nirwan University, India
Received: Mar 28, 2026 Accepted: May 25, 2026 Published: Jun 25, 2026
Article Metrics
36
Views
21
Downloads
Altmetric
PlumX Metrics
Abstract

Background: Computed Tomography (CT) and Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) positioning require a combination of theoretical knowledge and practical skills. Traditional teaching methods may offer limited opportunities for repeated hands-on practice.

Objective: To evaluate the effectiveness of virtual simulation-based training in improving CT and MRI positioning knowledge and practical competency among undergraduate radiography students.

Methods: A prospective pre-test and post-test educational intervention study was conducted among 30 undergraduate radiography students. Participants completed a four-week virtual simulation training program consisting of CT and MRI positioning modules. Knowledge was assessed using a 25-item multiple-choice questionnaire, while practical competency was evaluated through an Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE)-based assessment within the simulation environment. Student perceptions regarding the learning experience were also collected using a structured questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and paired t-tests, with statistical significance set at p < 0.05.

Results: All 30 participants completed the study. The mean knowledge score increased significantly from 13.8 ± 2.9 before training to 21.2 ± 2.1 after training (p < 0.001). Similarly, the mean practical competency score improved from 14.6 ± 3.2 to 23.4 ± 2.8 (p < 0.001). More than 90% of students reported increased confidence, improved understanding of CT and MRI positioning procedures, and satisfaction with the simulation-based learning experience. Most participants recommended the integration of simulation training into the radiography curriculum.

Conclusion: Virtual simulation-based training significantly improved both theoretical knowledge and practical competency in CT and MRI positioning among undergraduate radiography students. The findings support the incorporation of simulation-based learning as a valuable supplement to traditional radiography education.

 

Keywords: Virtual simulation, Radiography education, Computed tomography, Magnetic resonance imaging, Positioning competency.

Article Information
DOI: 10.62502/ijmi/v3i2art3
Journal: Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging
Abbreviation: Innov. J. Med. Imaging
ISSN (Online): 3048-5568
Volume/Issue: 3(2)
Pages: 15-20
References
  1. Lateef F. Simulation-based learning: Just like the real thing. J Emerg Trauma Shock. 2010;3(4):348–52.
  2. Issenberg SB, McGaghie WC, Petrusa ER, Gordon DL, Scalese RJ. Features and uses of high-fidelity medical simulations that lead to effective learning: A BEME systematic review. Med Teach. 2005;27(1):10–28.
  3. McGaghie WC, Issenberg SB, Cohen ER, Barsuk JH, Wayne DB. Does simulation-based medical education with deliberate practice yield better results than traditional clinical education? A meta-analytic comparative review of the evidence. Acad Med. 2011;86(6):706–11.
  4. Cook DA, Hatala R, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Technology-enhanced simulation for health professions education: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2011;306(9):978–88.
  5. Cant RP, Cooper SJ. Simulation-based learning in nurse education: Systematic review. J Adv Nurs. 2010;66(1):3–15.
  6. Motola I, Devine LA, Chung HS, Sullivan JE, Issenberg SB. Simulation in healthcare education: A best evidence practical guide. Med Teach. 2013;35(10):e1511–30.
  7. Ziv A, Wolpe PR, Small SD, Glick S. Simulation-based medical education: An ethical imperative. Acad Med. 2003;78(8):783–8.
  8. Okuda Y, Bryson EO, DeMaria S Jr, Jacobson L, Quinones J, Shen B, et al. The utility of simulation in medical education: What is the evidence? Mt Sinai J Med. 2009;76(4):330–43.
  9. Kneebone R. Simulation in surgical training: Educational issues and practical implications. Med Educ. 2003;37(3):267–77.
  10. Nestel D, Tierney T. Role-play for medical students learning about communication: Guidelines for maximising benefits. BMC Med Educ. 2007;7:3.
  11. Bridge P, Crowe SB, Gibson S, Ellemor NJ, Hargrave C, Carmichael MA. International audit of simulation use in pre-registration medical radiation science training. J Med Radiat Sci. 2014;61(1):15–21.
  12. Sapkaroski D, Mundy M, Dimmock MR. Virtual reality versus conventional clinical role-play for radiographic positioning training. Radiography (Lond). 2020;26(1):57–62.
  13. England A, Geers-van Gemeren S, Henner A, Kukkes T, Pronk-Larive D. Clinical simulation in radiography education: A literature review. Radiography (Lond). 2017;23(2):169–77.
  14. O'Connor M, Stowe J, Potocnik J, Giannotti N, Murphy S, Rainford L. 3D virtual reality simulation in radiography education: The students' experience. Radiography (Lond). 2021;27(1):208–14.
  15. Rainford L, O'Connor M, Murphy S, O'Keeffe D. The role of simulation in radiography education. Radiography (Lond). 2015;21(2):e113–8.
  16. Snaith B, Hardy M, Lewis EF. Radiography education and simulation: A review of current practice and future opportunities. Radiography (Lond). 2016;22(4):e281–7.
  17. Kourdioukova EV, Valcke M, Derese A, Verstraete KL. Analysis of radiology education in undergraduate medical training. Eur J Radiol. 2011;78(3):309–13.
  18. Binstadt ES, Walls RM, White BA, Nadel ES, Takayesu JK, Barker TD, et al. A comprehensive medical simulation education curriculum. Acad Emerg Med. 2007;14(9):861–8.
  19. Ericsson KA. Deliberate practice and acquisition of expert performance: A general overview. Acad Emerg Med. 2008;15(11):988–94.
  20. Cook DA, Brydges R, Hamstra SJ, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, et al. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):e867–98.
  21. Wayne DB, Didwania A, Feinglass J, Fudala MJ, Barsuk JH, McGaghie WC. Simulation-based education improves quality of care during cardiac arrest team responses. Acad Med. 2008;83(10):980–4.
  22. Cheng A, Auerbach M, Hunt EA, Chang TP, Pusic M, Nadkarni V, et al. Designing and conducting simulation-based research. Pediatrics. 2014;133(6):1091–101.
  23. Kerby J, Shukur ZN, Shalhoub J. The relationships between learning outcomes and methods of teaching anatomy as perceived by medical students. Clin Anat. 2011;24(4):489–97.
  24. Steadman RH, Coates WC, Huang YM, Matevosian R, Larmon BR, McCullough L, et al. Simulation-based training is superior to problem-based learning for the acquisition of critical assessment and management skills. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(1):151–7.
  25. Norman G. Simulation in medical education: Past, present and future. Med Educ. 2012;46(1):16–7.

 

How to Cite
Vancouver Style:
Singh SK, Mondal A. Enhancing CT and MRI Positioning Competency Through Virtual Simulation: A Prospective Educational Study. Innov. J. Med. Imaging 2026;3(2):15-20. doi: 10.62502/ijmi/v3i2art3
Download PDF
Quick Actions
Cite this article View on DOI Email this article
Article Details

Article Type:
Original Research

Volume/Issue:
3(2)

Year:
2026

Share