Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging Logo

Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging

Published by SPJ Publication

eISSN: 3048-5568

Original Research

Evaluation of Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Pathologies: A Cross-Sectional Study

Authors: Prashant Kumar Jha

Article Metrics
34
Views
30
Downloads
Altmetric

Abstract

Background: The urinary bladder plays a vital role in urine storage and controlled excretion. Pathologies affecting the bladder, including neoplastic, inflammatory, infectious, and obstructive conditions, can significantly impact patient health. Early and accurate diagnosis is essential for effective management. Computed tomography (CT), especially multidetector CT (MDCT) and CT urography, provides detailed visualization of the bladder and surrounding structures, offering both diagnostic and staging information.

Aim: To evaluate the effectiveness of CT in detecting various urinary bladder pathologies and to assess the utility of advanced CT techniques in clinical decision-making.

Methods: This observational, cross-sectional study was conducted in the Department of Radiology over six months (July 2024 – December 2024). A total of 100 patients presenting with symptoms suggestive of bladder or lower urinary tract pathology were included. CT examinations were performed using a Siemens SOMATOM 16-slice MDCT scanner. Imaging findings, including intraluminal lesions, mural thickening, extravesical extension, calculi, and obstruction, were analyzed. Data were correlated with clinical presentations, and statistical analysis was performed to determine the prevalence and significance of findings.

Results: Among 100 patients, 62 were male and 38 female, with a mean age of 52 ± 14 years. CT identified bladder pathologies in 78% of cases. Intraluminal lesions were observed in 44%, bladder wall thickening in 35%, extravesical extension in 12%, and urinary calculi in 21% of patients. CT urography demonstrated higher sensitivity (95%) in detecting intraluminal masses compared to non-contrast CT (78%). Statistical analysis showed significant correlation between hematuria and intraluminal lesions (p < 0.01), and between obstructive symptoms and extravesical extension (p < 0.05). CT imaging influenced clinical management in 67% of cases, guiding surgical or interventional planning.

Conclusion: CT, including MDCT and CT urography, is a reliable and effective modality for diagnosing urinary bladder pathologies. It enables detection of intraluminal, mural, and extravesical abnormalities, correlates well with clinical symptoms, and contributes significantly to patient management. Advanced CT techniques improve diagnostic accuracy and facilitate early intervention, supporting optimal clinical outcomes.

Keywords: Urinary Bladder, Computed Tomography, CT Urography, Multidetector CT


Article Information
DOI: 10.62502/ijmi/v2i1art1
Journal: Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging
Abbreviation: Innov. J. Med. Imaging
ISSN (Online): 3048-5568
Volume/Issue: 2(1)
Pages: 1-5

References

 

  1. Schmid M, Johnson TR, Rentsch C, et al. Bladder cancer diagnosis with CT urography: test characteristics and reasons for false‑positive and false‑negative results. Radiology. 2017;285(3):953–963. doi:10.1148/radiol.2017161332
  2. Fananapazir G, Dighe S, Cohan R, et al. Bladder cancer diagnosis: the role of CT urography. J Urol. 2015;194(3):708–714. doi:10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.093
  3. Shinagare AB, Sadow CA, Sahni VA, Silverman SG. Urinary bladder: normal appearance and mimics of malignancy at CT urography. Cancer Imaging. 2011;11(1):100–108. doi:10.1102/1470-7330.2011.0017
  4. Maher MM, Kalra MK, Rizzo S, Mueller PR, Saini S. Multidetector CT urography in imaging of the urinary tract in patients with hematuria. Korean J Radiol. 2004;5(1):1–10. doi:10.3348/kjr.2004.5.1.1
  5. Engel O, Wieland WF, Herden J, et al. CT urography for hematuria evaluation: diagnostic performance and pitfalls. Clin Radiol. 2011;66(4):321–327. doi:10.1016/j.crad.2010.11.010
  6. Yoshida K, Higashi M, Tono T, et al. CT urography versus cystoscopy for bladder cancer detection: sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic accuracy. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(6):1422–1431. doi:10.1007/s00330-014-3158-0
  7. Deng F, Xiong Y, Huang Z, et al. Medical image diagnostic value of computed tomography for bladder tumors: a retrospective analysis of 153 cases. Comput Math Methods Med. 2021;2021:3781028. doi:10.1155/2021/3781028
  8. Hall M, Smith G. Multidetector CT urography: a review of indications and imaging protocols. Eur J Radiol. 2011;80(2):278–285. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.09.031
  9. Zagoria RJ. Imaging of bladder cancer with emphasis on CT and MRI. Urol Clin North Am. 2006;33(2):169–182. doi:10.1016/j.ucl.2006.02.002
  10. Silverman SG, Leyendecker JR, Amis ES Jr. CT urography and MR urography for evaluation of hematuria. Radiology. 2008;246(3):620–643. doi:10.1148/radiol.2463070477
  11. McCarthy DM, Testa EJ, Gorman JD. Bladder carcinoma: staging and imaging with CT and MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1993;161(6):1201–1207. doi:10.2214/ajr.161.6.8255042
  12. Silverman SG, Gan YU, Zhao C, et al. CT urography: evaluation of urothelial neoplasms of the upper urinary tract and bladder. Radiographics. 2006;26(6):1687–1699. doi:10.1148/rg.266065009
How to Cite
Vancouver Style:
Jha PK. Evaluation of Computed Tomography in the Diagnosis of Urinary Bladder Pathologies: A Cross-Sectional Study. Innov. J. Med. Imaging 2025;2(1):1-5. doi: 10.62502/ijmi/v2i1art1