ISSN (Print): 3139-891X ISSN (Online): 3048-5568

Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging

Official Journal of AARAIS

Open Access Journal

Review Article

Radiomics and Machine Learning in Tumor Characterization and Treatment Planning

Authors:
Prashant Kumar Jha
Avinash Chaubey

Article Metrics
391
Views
211
Downloads
Altmetric

Abstract

Recent advancements in radiomics and machine learning (ML) are revolutionizing the landscape of cancer diagnostics and treatment planning. Radiomics enables the extraction of high-dimensional quantitative features from standard medical imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, and PET, transforming non-invasive scans into data-rich resources for tumor characterization. When integrated with ML algorithms, these features can facilitate predictive modeling for tumor detection, classification, prognosis, and therapeutic response, allowing for a highly personalized approach to oncology. This integration empowers clinicians to go beyond traditional histopathology by enabling in vivo phenotyping of tumors, revealing spatial heterogeneity and biological signatures that are often missed by biopsies. Numerous studies have demonstrated the utility of radiomics in various cancer types, including glioblastoma, lung, and breast cancers, while ML models such as Support Vector Machines (SVM), Random Forests, and deep learning networks like Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) have shown promise in enhancing classification accuracy and treatment planning. Despite its potential, challenges such as data standardization, interpretability, and clinical validation remain critical barriers to widespread implementation. This review discusses the theoretical foundation of radiomics, ML methodologies, clinical applications in tumor characterization and treatment adaptation, and future directions including radiogenomics, real-time analytics, and accessible cloud-based platforms. Addressing these issues is essential to fully realize the transformative potential of radiomics and ML in precision oncology.


Keywords: Radiomics, Machine learning, Tumour


Article Information
DOI: 10.62502/ijmi/898cbm72
Journal: Innovative Journal of Medical Imaging
Abbreviation: Innov. J. Med. Imaging
ISSN (Print): 3139-891X
ISSN (Online): 3048-5568
Volume/Issue: 1(2)
Pages: 16-20

References
  1. Lambin P, Rios-Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Carvalho S, van Stiphout RG, Granton P, et al. Radiomics: extracting more information from medical images using advanced feature analysis. Eur J Cancer. 2012;48(4):441–6.
  2. Kumar V, Gu Y, Basu S, Berglund A, Eschrich SA, Schabath MB, et al. Radiomics: the process and the challenges. Magn Reson Imaging. 2012;30(9):1234–48.
  3. Gillies RJ, Kinahan PE, Hricak H. Radiomics: images are more than pictures, they are data. Radiology. 2016;278(2):563–77.
  4. Aerts HJ, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, et al. Decoding tumour phenotype by noninvasive imaging using a quantitative radiomics approach. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006.
  5. Parmar C, Grossmann P, Rietveld D, Rietbergen MM, Lambin P, Aerts HJ. Radiomic machinelearning classifiers for prognostic biomarkers of head and neck cancer. Front Oncol. 2015;5:272.
  6. Hosny A, Parmar C, Quackenbush J, Schwartz LH, Aerts HJ. Artificial intelligence in radiology. Nat Rev Cancer. 2018;18(8):500–10.
  7. Bi WL, Hosny A, Schabath MB, Giger ML, Birkbak NJ, Mehrtash A, et al. Artificial intelligence in cancer imaging: clinical challenges and applications. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019;69(2):127–57.
  8. Kickingereder P, Burth S, Wick A, Götz M, Eidel O, Schlemmer HP, et al. Radiomic profiling of glioblastoma: identifying an imaging predictor of patient survival with improved performance over established clinical and radiologic risk models. Radiology. 2016;280(3):880– 9.
  9. Liu Y, Kim J, Balagurunathan Y, Li Q, Garcia AL, Stringfield O, et al. Radiomic features are associated with EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinomas. Clin Lung Cancer. 2016;17(5):441–8.
  10. Li H, Zhu Y, Burnside ES, Drukker K, Hoadley KA, Fan C, et al. Quantitative MRI radiomics in the prediction of molecular classifications of breast cancer subtypes in the TCGA/TCIA data set. NPJ Breast Cancer. 2016;2:16012.
  11. Zhang B, Tian J, Dong D, Gu D, Dong Y, Zhang L, et al. Radiomics features of multiparametric MRI as novel prognostic factors in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2017;23(15):4259–69.
  12. Yip SS, Aerts HJ. Applications and limitations of radiomics. Phys Med Biol. 2016;61(13):R150–66.
  13. Zwanenburg A, Vallières M, Abdalah MA, Aerts HJ, Andrearczyk V, Apte A, et al. The Image Biomarker Standardization Initiative: standardized quantitative radiomics for high-throughput image-based phenotyping. Radiology. 2020;295(2):328–38.
  14. Wu W, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Quackenbush J, Lambin P, Bussink J, et al. Exploratory study to identify radiomics classifiers for lung cancer histology. Front Oncol. 2016;6:71.
  15. Parmar C, Velazquez ER, Leijenaar RT, Jermoumi M, Carvalho S, Mak RH, et al. Robust radiomics feature quantification using semiautomatic volumetric segmentation. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e102107.
  16. Aerts HJ, Rios Velazquez E, Leijenaar R, Parmar C, Grossmann P, Carvalho S, et al. Defining the radiomic feature reproducibility. Nat Commun. 2014;5:4006.
  17. Lao J, Chen Y, Li ZC, Li Q, Zhang J, Liu J, et al. A deep learning-based radiomics model for prediction of survival in glioblastoma multiforme. Sci Rep. 2017;7:10353.
  18. Jethanandani A, Lin TA, Volpe S, Switchenko JM, Landry JC, Higgins KA, et al. Exploring applications of radiomics in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer: a systematic review. Front Oncol. 2018;8:131.
  19. van Dijk LV, Van den Bosch L, Al-Mamgani A, Spasiano R, Crezee J, Zuur CL, et al. Improving patient selection for adaptive radiotherapy of head and neck cancer by including information from pretreatment PET-CT and CT scans. Radiother Oncol. 2020;142:124–31.
  20. Wang Y, Liu W, Yu Y, Liu T, Song L, Dong Z, et al. Predicting survival in patients with colorectal cancer using CT radiomics: a radiomics signature. Cancer Med. 2019;8(9):4085–92.
  21. Zwanenburg A, Leger S, Vallières M, Löck S. Image biomarker standardisation initiative. arXiv preprint. 2016;arXiv:1612.07003.
  22. Holzinger A, Langs G, Denk H, Zatloukal K, Müller H. Causability and explainability of artificial intelligence in medicine. Wiley Interdiscip Rev Data Min Knowl Discov. 2019;9(4):e1312.
  23. 23. Gillies RJ, Schabath MB. Radiomics improves cancer screening and early detection. Cancer Imaging Arch. 2021;21(1):8.
  24. Itakura H, Achrol AS, Mitchell LA, Loya JJ, Liu T, Westbroek EM, et al. Magnetic resonance image features identify glioblastoma phenotypic subtypes with distinct molecular pathway activities. Sci Transl Med. 2015;7(303):303ra138.
  25. Tseng HH, Luo Y, Cui S, Chien JT, Ding H, Chang JT, et al. Deep learning-based prediction of treatment response and survival outcomes from PET images in non–small cell lung cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2021;27(3):821–9.
  26. Bhargava HK, Ghosh S, Foltz JR, Christodoulou E, Knoll F, Recht MP, et al. Cloud computing and artificial intelligence in radiology: opportunities and challenges. Radiology: Artificial Intelligence. 2020;2(6):e190017.
How to Cite
Vancouver Style:
Jha PK, Chaubey A. Radiomics and Machine Learning in Tumor Characterization and Treatment Planning. Innov. J. Med. Imaging 2024;1(2):16-20. doi: 10.62502/ijmi/898cbm72